Enter Health Logo
Enter Health
Claimed

Enter Health

Enter Health is a revenue cycle management platform offering automated claims processing, payment posting, denial management, patient collection, and real-time reporting.

Reviews (2)

Enter Health Transcript
View Product Page

4/5
13 min readReviewed on: 10/05/2023
Reviewer
Title: Revenue Cycle Coordinator
Organization Type: Specialty Practice
Specialty: Pulmonology
Summary
  • Product Usage: Enter functions as the claims submission provider, handling insurance responses, verifying eligibility, and informing us of any claims denials.

  • Strengths: Enter offers transparency, allowing the reviewer to see actions taken on a claim, are specific in what needs to be done to resolve a given claim, and are responsive to operational feedback.

  • Weaknesses: Enter sometimes does not respond to messages quickly enough, and they sometimes fail to keep track of changes, resulting in redundancy in communication.

  • Overall Judgment: Despite some communication issues, Enter provides a very good service offering transparency, support, and guidance. The reviewer feels their decision was correct.

Other Products Considered

Enter Health Transcript
View Product Page

4/5
22 min readReviewed on: 06/27/2023
Reviewer
Title: Head of Product
Organization Type: Long-term Care Facility
Summary
  • Product Usage: Enter Health was used for revenue cycle management (RCM) services focused on CMS-1450 institutional billing for Medicare and Medicaid in a value-based setting.

  • Strengths: The strengths of Enter health include their advancement in AI and software efficiency, reasonable pricing model at smaller and larger scales, transparency in the data system, well-designed search function for outstanding or processed claims, automated functionalities, and excellent customer support.

  • Weaknesses: The products main weakness was its lack of knowledge and expertise in the users specialty and extensive difficulties in the integration process.

  • Overall Judgment: Enter Health is a robust platform with efficient and transparent processes, despite its shortcomings in handling specific specialties; better understanding of the different models between service-based and tech-based RCM could influence the decision to use it.