Product Usage: The Assort Health AI Call Center system is heavily used in managing patient appointments including booking, rescheduling, and cancelling for new and established patients.

Strengths: The system significantly reduces call abandonment rates, extends service hours beyond traditional call center operations, and allows for a smoother, more efficient patient experience.

Weaknesses: An area for improvement is in the linking of insurance to the patient, which has been a challenge but is expected to improve with the integration of Epic.

Overall Judgment: Assort Health AI Call Center has been highly beneficial, contributing significantly to improved patient experience and clinic efficiency, with potential for further growth and integration with revenue cycle management and other services.

Product Usage: Zendesk was used for customer inquiry management, acting as an information hub and for product roadmapping.

Strengths: Zendesk’s community engagement and responsive customer support are its main strengths.

Weaknesses: Zendesk lacks in design and visualization features, resulting in formatting issues and limited customization.

Overall Judgment: Despite some limitations, Zendesk was a good choice due to its easy integration and out-of-the-box features.

Product Usage: The reviewers, working in a health services startup, use Weave for patient communications, particularly making phone calls and sending SMS to patients.

Strengths: Weave’s strengths include affordability, HIPAA compliance, and basic communication functionalities like voice call and SMS.

Weaknesses: Weaknesses comprise dispersed and inconsistent customer support, lack of software-based option, and difficulties in phone setup.

Overall Judgment: The reviewers find Weave satisfactory for the current basic communication needs, though they express concerns about its ability to meet future requirements.

Product Usage: Zendesk is used for managing multiple points of customer inquiries; phone, email, and chat functionalities considered efficient; the majority of the use is for managing patient queries; separate workflow created for managing communication with clinicians.

Strengths: Easy to navigate and minimal training required; comprehensive for basic customer service needs; allows for effortless access to necessary data and contains good analytics capabilities.

Weaknesses: Lack of real-time dashboards for incoming issues and volume; delayed delivery of some crucial features; difficulties experienced with customer service; issues with scaling and pulling individual reports; might need to integrate with other phone options for more complex needs.

Overall Judgment: Zendesk is simple, especially for teams that need to hit the ground running with basic customer service operations; it’s a reliable and intuitive platform despite the need to improve in certain areas like live reporting and dashboards; good option for organizations with strict budget constraints.

Product Usage: Zendesk was used to centralize operations, handle member services and create effective workflows for incoming calls across a healthcare company servicing a Medicaid population.

Strengths: Zendesk is easy to implement, offers a low lift for internal IT and engineering teams, provides robust out-of-the-box reporting, and integrates well with other services like Talkdesk.

Weaknesses: The standalone telephony feature of Zendesk was lacking without integration with Talkdesk, and the text functionality was limited, more suited to respond to inbound text rather than initiate outbound messages.

Overall Judgment: Zendesk is a useful and cost-effective tool for streamlining operations and increasing efficiency in handling customer/member services, although there is room for improvement in its standalone features.